Log for
電訊台
make trouble in hong kong?
我需要是大量進修例如考ccna cert 等 或leetcode 練習多過需要睇精神科
去藥房睇下有冇 citicoline 賣,補腦 🙊
90% of the time
有無人去做過ADHD類別測試?
我應該買一些燕麥格格脆加什麼走脂牛奶當臨睡前美食差不多
It does its job, one simple job
Other stuffs are handled by that Juniper switch
其實都仲有 DHCP 嘅 不過果個都係 simple job 🤔
應該set返好似啲看更咁, 個screen fix死咗4格嗰隻
serves different purposes
yes , we all know about it
我有套 software 得但係對於普通人黎講係好... 貴
我頂,可以sharing 一下我打嗰關同揼曲一樣 腦袋怎麼星球大戰 好似d人問究竟用Cisco 定aws 好
呢個又係 叫他們學中國咁樣上萬里長城內的世界就最好
where is dubai in this sentence
有人問Cisco 定 aws cloud 上邊個好用
d VPN claim 自己no log policy
To improve the security of your account, as well as to prevent spam, abuse, and other violations of our Terms of Service, we may collect metadata such as your IP address, devices and Telegram apps you've used, history of username changes, etc. If collected, this metadata can be kept for 12 months maximum.
We’ve designed the Signal service to minimize the data we retain about Signal users, so the only information we can produce in response to a request like this is the date and time a user registered with Signal and the last date of a user’s connectivity to the Signal service.
如果連討論重點都未明(Privacy Policy只係紙上談兵)
就衝出黎問人柒完未
未免太衝動🤷🏻♂️
我認為technical implementation 比一紙policy重要
但問題係,in case有spam,點判斷佢係spammer
telegram就畀左個解釋:佢keep 12month metadata
但signal只係畀到一句19"To protect against harm to the rights, property, or safety of Signal, our users, or the public as required or permitted by law."
點解到宜家呢個 moment 仲有得拗?前世唔識字?
兩邊都有possible嘅loophole係到(或者咁講,冚世界messager都有佢自己嘅loophole)差在佢同你講定你自己見到,最後就係自己點處理
不如講解下 zero knowledge 保障唔到D咩?
睇你點睇,佢有一份guideline policy係到,只係避免左一啲可能性咁解,但佢亦可以唔理個policy,或者做false statement
audit的存在就係要証明policy有strictly enforced
呢個就係另一個問題,而最基本嘅一樣野係:你點樣確保到佢係zero knowledge
audit, lawforce都係去緊同一樣野,by good faith
即係你覺得technical implementation 保障大
定
on paper policy 保障大…
係睇你個confident level去到幾多咁解
我對telegram confident level就係可以吹水交流嘈交etc
tech 嘅好處係除非有野出錯,唔係嘅話就可以reperform返啲野出黎
policy個啲,難聽啲講嘅係,blackbox野
whatsapp, telegram, signal, wire...
但係,有樣野又好頂癮,suppose whatsapp係行end-to-end嘅
咁佢點share information to facebook
share from unencrypted whatsapp backup on Android.........
所以個end to end is totally rubbish
就算佢有tech implement....well,i dont know
this is why WhatsApp and Signal has fundamental difference?
by good faith on both side, yes
所以返去Ivan提嘅zero knowledge,最fundamental嘅野係,你點樣ensure佢係zero knowledge
之後先係benefit of zero knowledge
open source? Signal is fully open source, even the server-side software
ok, you check the code, you decompiled the app package and verify open source code if same shit and finally you can certified there is no shit thing on client side and with end-to-end encryption , suppose there is no shit thing on server side.
And here comes the magic question: How can signal know or/and verify you are abusing signal/violating tnc?
OS should not be the scope of this discussion
initially, there is no way to tell if a user is abusing/violating Signal TOS, and untill to date, there isn't a protection for such case. But the Signal team did introduced the "Message Request" feature and block strangers messaging/harassing you in the first place, you get the control on who to communicate with.
But let's get back to your question: Why should signal knows if a user is violating their TOS, given there already mechanisms preventing such cases? (i.e. message rate limiting)
the idea of my original point
is the app design and implementation speaks more then the landing page/policy
deciding which app to use by the policy is meaningless
i am justing tryin gto proof this point
Its because we cant say there is no loophole to let the user override the mechanism, and in such of the situation, refer to the tnc and privacy policy, signal has the right to check and see if there is abusing or violating tnc. Of course, they can do nothing and go ahead.
Under "Other instances where Signal may need to share your data" listed two items:
"To enforce applicable Terms, including investigation of potential violations.
To detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, or technical issues."
Yes, policy can be changed
想通了,即將要和社會接軌,
就職後要拼盡全力 賺錢,拿取權力
Who thought WhatsApp would link with facebook when they used it back then?
did they ever enforce it?
首先經 香港公開大學BBA(C&G) FT. 進場,先拿Degree。
4年 Business Law, 將來就可以用法律監管公司各個部門。
又要負責幫公司和 港交所,稅務局聯繫。
更加可以有能力為公司制定未來政策。
表現好的話可以入董事會。
簡直是公司主力核心。
中華電纜好似故障喎 台灣嗰邊Netflix好似不斷地loading
另外中華電信同 Netflix 嘅 peering 有問題
Netflix 有比 route 中華電信
中華電信無比 route Netflix
即係 Netflix -> CHT 方向會飛去美國
我係大文件放gdrive無限
細文件想放本地啲minio
你嚟用我嘅機連 azure 都會可以有 traffic discount
Google backbone 有啲 capacity 係用緊 APG
話時話 Google 買返嚟啲 capacity 全部都冇保護
no maybe choose alicloud or tencent shit
dont really give a fuck this point, whoever has the best value wins