Log for
電訊台
I have asked CF Engineer,
They said this client is just move to CF, and their own host may be being attack.
So, CF is normal. But their host is being attack. And because their DNS just changed to CF, so the route is not updated as well.
I don`t understand, are you pinging a website, or a IP address ? Why you ping a CF IP >?
this website is being attack as said.
This website is just moved to CF 24 hours
And their host is being attack, as I said checked with CF Engineer
Very easy to flood a website / server by UDP
Send huge shit traffic over the port capacity
And they looks like is a beginner and don`t know how to handle the attack
The attacker is send traffic to their real host, not CF
They are trying to switch the attack traffic to CF
So they stuck at this point.
time to up the game with paid plan of argo tunnel?
CF is working fine as said, no null route
change IP, enable argo tunnel, no way to attack unless CF leaks their IP
就係想知點解ping一個cf ip會斷,因為理論上好多網share同一個cf ip
or gen the whole pages to html and host it using worker
只係用Host header做reverse proxy
They havent change their REAL Host, so the Attacker is still send traffic to their REAL host, so CF can`t read data from the host, so BAD 502
This website is hosted by a noob
And this noob said HK has GFW, this is a joke
always don't host email yourselves lol
We are here, have direct link to oversea, so not possible to block any website
another ng secure DNS history case
甚至你自己網站寫得唔開有地方可以 leverage
Can you check how host their website DNS ?
Attacker can attack their DNS server as well to shutdown the website
normal, this applies to all CF ip
Where they host their DNS, before move to CF
We are using Google Anycast DNS, better then CF
there are some trail record websites to search for
套 Anti-DDoS 幫人哋 subnet inject 咗 null route
130 [saren@saren-xps13 ~ ]% curl -v
http://104.27.135.74/ > /dev/null
* Trying
104.27.135.74:80...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0* Connected to
104.27.135.74 (
104.27.135.74) port 80 (#0)
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> Host:
104.27.135.74> User-Agent: curl/7.74.0
> Accept: */*
>
* Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse
< HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
< Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 07:34:12 GMT
< Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
< Content-Length: 16
< Connection: close
< X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
< Cache-Control: private, max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
< Expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:01 GMT
< Set-Cookie: __cfduid=dee753a677a8a32c4267fb69ce4065e841610091252; expires=Sun, 07-Feb-21 07:34:12 GMT; path=/; domain=.
104.27.135.74; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
< cf-request-id: 078283e4480000cc2ce412e000000001
< Server: cloudflare
< CF-RAY: 60e43c1a0f70cc2c-SIN
<
{ [16 bytes data]
100 16 100 16 0 0 195 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 195
if you hit me, you hit google
上次 PCCW 套 Anti-DDoS 幫我朋友個 network inject 咗 null route 仲落埋 hkix
And our RDNS also host at Anycast , LOL
A higher layer attacker will attack RDNS, not DNS
姐係pccw anti ddos擋左出去既traffic?
cheap money, but the attacker wasted a lot.
if you trust CF then both are handled by them
CF don`t have RDNS hosting
Just server provider need RDNS
but the exposed IP is CF's
normal web site owner don`t need rdns hosting
if you need to host mail server...
As said, their host is being attack, may be included DNS (Not CF one)
you host a mail server, is ask your ISP to change rDNS for you, not host a rDNS
DNS is fine for the moment
if you can resolve using their NS directly
and if they are using CF, then
1.1.1.1 would work lol
I just want to know where they host their HOST server. so I can deep check
such important site use Google tools
Basiclly
1.1.1.1 is not owned by CF.
They just operate DNS on this
1.1.1.1
not going to be visible unless you cached it before
traffic大爆炸,免煩就入null route
Yes, I know the handle man.
1.1.1.1 as a service, since it's what's called
And China have hijacked
1.1.1.1 some years ago
Even Cisco captive portal uses
1.1.1.1 before you authenticate
about 3 years ago, APNIC start to use
1.1.1.1
So many company used
1.1.1.1 for their own service
i guess a lot of people do
if you ever need to verify with google lol
And APNIC have a record saved for big data, once you used
1.1.1.1 for search website
i route through ipv6
locally i host my own dnscrypt proxy
Cloudflare still receive garbage traffic to
1.1.1.1
1.1.1.1 + Host header can go cloudflare site
Fucking this covid-19, otherwise I join their conf. event
Not trust CF, trust APNIC
肥囝,你有冇trace route係由PCCW出去
if you properly use dnscrypt or doh, then the queries are encrypted to cf servers
大呢個就係pccw home traceroute出去
As said, I know their team at APNIC for working at
1.1.1.1
so if the servers are operated by apnic, that's not much to talk about
IP is owned by APNIC, but server is opereate by CF
Both side I also have their contact.
I don`t know Chinese input
APNIC is the backend. APNIC Lab.
looks like CF from the beginning
Bcoz front end will get your data first, so they share to APNIC Lab, who own this IP address
then what kind of data APNIC gets would trace back to you?
So the attacker found their host IP, direct attack the host, so CF CDN can`t load their Host data, so 502 BAD
But they will not use to tracert you.
"Cloudflare has agreed to provide APNIC with access to some of the anonymized data that Cloudflare collects through the Cloudflare Public DNS Resolver. Specifically, APNIC will be permitted to access query names, query types, resolver location and other metadata via a Cloudflare API, that will allow APNIC to study topics like the volume of DDoS attacks launched on the Internet and adoption of IPv6." so the "other metadata" is essentially all data?
If you want to know more, join their event
Their event will host every 6 months
every 6 months will have APNIC event
i don't have direct business with them
They all will disclose what they do
You will meet a lot of friends over the world.
try type more chinese chars
for real, i've a hard time reading your eng text
Bcoz I`m using short english
e.g. why "`" instead of " ' "
may be
Taskmaster can explain what i'm frustrated with
BTW, I chat with oversea friend is using this short English
And all they can understand
Traffic problem, blackholed
Still can't figure out the why that Smartone internal DNS returns
127.0.0.1
CF 又唔係 HK Local Transit customer
話說有冇人知道 VPLS 可唔可以做到點對多點 🤔
我依家兩條主要 Local Loop 都係搵 Traxcomm
可能check check下發現國安做緊野 要收聲 (?)
應該唔係,因為如果咁而要take down嘅話,suppose DNS見到嘅Record都要take donw
我係加密嗰便姐 但要做到咁我都要諗緊係咪真係電訊商做嘢